Dnia 19-10-2010 o 00:20:29 klickverbot <s...@klickverbot.at> napisał(a):
On 10/18/10 9:56 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
* require declarations for all version identifiers. Versions which are
set from the command line should be explicitly declared, eg:
version Lite = extern;
version Demo = extern;
That would make creating a bird's nest impossible.
And currently, you can make a typo like:
version(Linix) {}
and it compiles happily. I don't like that. Especially when we have
builtin names like D_Inline_Asm_X86_64!
This is an awesome idea. ++votes
+1 from me too, this could be one of the key parts of a long outstanding
version() overhaul.
What also bugs me about the current situation (despite the fact that I
think numeric versions should be removed, but that's another story) is
that the equals sign to define a new version seems very illogical –
»version ~= someUserDefinedVersion« would make much more sense to me…
I like the explicit version declarations too. My share of bikeshedding:
/** Possible versions of AwesomestApp. */
version AweHome, AwePro, AweSome;
version AweExp; /// Experimental AwesomestApp.
--
Tomek
