On 2010-10-24 04:55, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"bearophile"<bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:ia0410$1lj...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky:
But that's all if you want generalized lexing or parsing though. If you
just
want "lexing D code"/"parsing D code", then IMO anything other than
adapting
parts of DDMD would be the wrong way to go.
Is the DDMD licence compatible with the Phobos one? Is the DDMD author(s)
willing?
I'd certainly hope so. If it isn't, then that would probably mean DMD's FE
license is incompatible with Phobos. Which would be rather...weird.
In any case, I asked that and a couple other Q's here, but haven't gotten an
answer yet:
http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5627
As Walter wrote in the first post of this thread: "generally follow
along with the C++ one so that they can be maintained in tandem" and in
another post: "Since the license is mine, I can change the D version to
the Boost license, no problem."
http://www.digitalmars.com/pnews/read.php?server=news.digitalmars.com&group=digitalmars.D&artnum=120221
--
/Jacob Carlborg
