Diego Cano Lagneaux wrote:
>>>
>>> Of which there are very few. A linux distro or community repository
>>> cannot distribute dmd at all, it is prohibited by the license. This is
>>> primarily a practical issue, not an ideological one.
>>
>> Right.. I forgot the issue is also practical. If DigitalMars doesn't
>> allow redistribution, they simply cannot include it even if they wanted.
>>
> ArchLinux includes dmd (version 1) in its community repo. It does not
> seem so impossible as you say.

        Are you sure? Here, "yaourt -Ss dmd" only show results from AUR
(which means that they download from DigitalMars anyway)

                Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to