Pelle Månsson Wrote: > On 11/05/2010 12:43 PM, Gary Whatmore wrote: > > bearophile Wrote: > >> - A way to list what attributes are modified in a method (similar to my > >> @outer). > > > > The compiler should do this itself. > > Doesn't make sense. > > >> My reference issue: > >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4571 > > > > Walter, please close this as wontfix. We don't need those. These extra > > runtime checks will slow down my code. I know myself when my pointer is > > null. > > > > - G.W. > > How, exactly, do you know when your references are null? Without > runtime checks, of course.
Good code design makes the null pointer exceptions go away. I carefully ponder what code goes where. Simple as that. That language just introduces a boatload of unnecessary cruft in forms of runtime null checks. I don't need to know the exact temporal location of nulls, it's enough if the code takes care of handling it at run time.
