Nick Sabalausky <a...@a.a> wrote:
- if ( m > 12 ) { + if ( p && m > 12 ) {And you can toss in an "if(m>12) assert(p);" if you're worried about that.
Of course. But the point is, this is unnecessary. We know p !is null when m > 4. -- Simen
Nick Sabalausky <a...@a.a> wrote:
- if ( m > 12 ) { + if ( p && m > 12 ) {And you can toss in an "if(m>12) assert(p);" if you're worried about that.
Of course. But the point is, this is unnecessary. We know p !is null when m > 4. -- Simen