== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article > "Eric Poggel" <dnewsgro...@yage3d.net> wrote in message > news:ibd00s$dl...@digitalmars.com... > > On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed > >> view-only and didn't grow too much logic. > > > > Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity and > > static typing of C#, and the "immediate mode" of php? > I doubt it. The only "php immediate mode" stuff I'm aware of PHP itself, and > classic-style ASP using either VBScript or JScript (And sort of ColdFusion, > but you'd probably just be better off with PHP). The unpopularity of that > style probably means that nothing else like that is in the works. And > web-oriended languages seem to usually be dynamic aside from the Java and > ASP.NET camps.
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article > "Eric Poggel" <dnewsgro...@yage3d.net> wrote in message > news:ibd00s$dl...@digitalmars.com... > > On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> I could probably live with that as long as the "PHP template" stayed > >> view-only and didn't grow too much logic. > > > > Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity and > > static typing of C#, and the "immediate mode" of php? > I doubt it. The only "php immediate mode" stuff I'm aware of PHP itself, and > classic-style ASP using either VBScript or JScript Ahem... http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/07/02/introducing-razor.aspx