On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Gibson <metalcae...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Andrew Wiley schrieb: > > >> One thought here: >> If Tango is still useful in the D world but there isn't too much >> enthusiasm about porting it to D2, why not break its functionality (that >> isn't already in Phobos 2) down into a set of supplemental libraries that >> can be included as needed? >> > > Or just put it in one library and call it "Tango2" or something like that > ;) > > (To allow porting of all kinds of Tango programs, about every Tango class > would have to be ported to D2 anyway, so one could just as well do a proper > port. Because of druntime it could coexist with Phobos2 - which was really > the point of druntime for D2. Unfortunately nobody wanted to do this > hitherto). > It's also worthy of note that I wasn't addressing the porting of Tango programs specifically. The modular approach does lose there.
