Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Wednesday 10 November 2010 13:01:55 Jens Mueller wrote: > > > So, while I don't necessarily see anything wrong with calling fun() in > > > this situation being legal, I don't see the point. > > > > My main point is that I'd like to know what is implemented as in > > mentioned TDPL and what isn't. > > I suspect that someone like Don or Walter would have to answer in this case. > They're the most likely to know what the compiler is actually doing vs what > they > intend it to do. A bug report on it should likely be opened though, since it > doesn't match TDPL. Either it needs to be fixed to match TDPL (which is > likely in > this case), or it needs to be made clear what behavior it's supposed to have, > at > which point the TDPL errata should be updated.
I added a report. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5200 Thanks for your help. Jens
