Freshly added to the normal-priority queue! Thank goodness. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu < seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> On 11/11/10 3:33 PM, bearophile wrote: > >> Now this discussion seems settled enough, so I may summarize its results a >> little (please fix this list if you see an error): >> >> - Andrei Alexandrescu has said this idea doesn't harm but he sees not much >> evidence this is a problem in C/C++. >> - Don has not said how much he likes the idea, but he has shown no >> technical opposition against it, and I think he may accept it. >> - Sean Kelly sees no technical problems in the idea, and I think he >> accepts it. >> - Steven Schveighoffer likes the idea. >> - Vladimir Panteleev likes the idea. >> - Manfred Nowak seems to like the idea. >> - Michel Fortin seems to like this idea. >> - Yao G. is opposed (but he has shown to not consider the usage of ~ to >> concat lines). >> - dennis luehring likes the idea. >> - klickverbot agrees with the idea. >> - Jonathan M Davis agrees with the idea. >> - Rainer Deyke has suggested a problem that may be solved or doesn't >> exists. >> - spir seems now more or less OK with the idea, but I am not sure. >> - so seems a OK with the idea now, but I am not sure. >> - I like this idea. >> - Brad Roberts has expressed no opinion on the topic. >> >> On average the answers seem positive. So, Walter are you willing to >> deprecate automatic joining of adjacent strings (and later turn it into a >> syntax error, the error message may suggest to add a ~)? >> > > Let me ask a related question: if there were a priority list of things that > Walter should be busy with, where would this feature be on that list? > > Andrei >