Steven Schveighoffer: > Then you just wasted time duping that argument. Instead of a defensive > dup, what if we had a function ensureHeaped (better name suggestions?)
I have created a bug report to avoid this whole pair of threads to be lost in the dusts of time: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212 Feel free to add a note about your ensureHeaped() idea at the end of that enhancement request :-) (To that enhancement request I have not added my idea of the @onheap attribute because I think it's too much complex to implement according to the design style of the D compiler). Bye, bearophile
