On 11/16/10 9:58 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:24:50 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
On 11/16/10 9:21 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:10:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1912728
Andrei
"I like go because every single feature go has is the best ever!"
yawn...
-Steve
I'm curious what the response to my example will be. So far I got one
that doesn't even address it.
It's possible that you left your point as an exercise for the reader, so
it may be lost.
But it's not important. It's unlikely that you will convince goers that
the language deficiencies are not worth the advantages. Only time will
tell how popular/useful it will be. That one point you made would be a
deal-killer for me (not that I'm close to using Go or anything, but no
need to invest any more time on it after that).
(cue retard's comment about D zealots not having any open mindedness)
-Steve
I think as soon as that defect registers at Go's creators, they will
scramble to fix it one way or another. It's a blatant syntax design mistake.
Andrei
