== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article > The issue is that if you append to such an array and it adds more pages in > place, the block length location will move. Since each thread caches its > own copy of the block info, one will be wrong and look at array data > thinking it's a length field. > Even if you surround the appends with a lock, it will still cause problems > because of the cache. I'm not sure there's any way to reliably append to > such data from multiple threads. > -Steve
Would assumeSafeAppend() do the trick?
