On Wednesday 17 November 2010 21:51:24 Kagamin wrote: > Jonathan M Davis Wrote: > > I'd have to study up on it to see whether there are any real problems > > with it. > > Speaking in posix terms, performance counter is more like CLOCK_MONOTONIC > and using it as CLOCK_REALTIME is a dependency on undefined behavior.
If you have a better way to do it, I'm all ears. However, it's the only way that I know of to get high-precision time on Windows. - Jonathan M Davis
