On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:39:19 +0100
Don <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> I think we're seeing the exact same issue that causes to people to
> mistakenly use 'uint' when they mean 'positive integer'.
> It LOOKS as though a char is a subset of dchar (ie, a dchar in the range
> 0..0x7F).
Cannot be, in the sense of uint beeing a subset ulong. That's why "char", if
not perfect, is a good name, providing the programmer with a hint about actual
semantics. What i don't understand is why people who need unsigned bytes do not
use ubyte? But instead bug into char. Is this only because of C baggage?
> It LOOKS as though a uint is a subset of int (ie, an int in the range
> 0..int.max).
This indeed is a big issue. I would prefere uint (= Natural) to be implemented
as a subset of int:
uint 0 --> +7fffffff
int -f000000 --> +7fffffff
Denis
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
vit esse estrany ☣
spir.wikidot.com
