On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 05:51 +0100, Torarin wrote: > Static interfaces (same thing as c++ 0x's ditched concepts) seem very > useful. Did you consider them at some point?
Concepts didn't make C++0x but I am sure Bjarne will bring a revised proposal back to the table. If the C++ committee do what the Fortran committee do, then there could be an intermediate standard within the usual 10 year cycle. So assuming C++0x is actually ratified, then 4 years later concepts could get into the language. I was at a workshop end of last year that was looking at various issues in C++ and ML's (probably OCaml's?) ability to handle all this sort of stuff for many years got Bjarne convinced to revisit concepts and create a revised proposal. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
