On 2010-11-27 20:55:51 -0500, Adam Burton <adz...@gmail.com> said:
Personally I think having an "implements" makes sense (that loops through the methods of an interface and checks the type has matching methods, not the same as having a class "implement" an interface which is more like inheritance). However as you say, that is not how interfaces in their current form are designed to be used so I understand why people disagree.
Well, if you consider the previously discussed 'adaptTo' function template, all types can be adapted to an interface (via a template-generated wrapper class). So "implements" for structs isn't too far off, as you can use the struct to implement the interface via 'adaptTo'.
-- Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com http://michelf.com/
