On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:41:45 -0800 Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote:
> > What I think is pretty clear from this is that at some point, some work > > needs to be done to optimize array comparisons when memcmp can be used > > instead of having to call the individual opEquals() of each element. It's > > not the sort of thing that's likely to be a priority, but it really should > > be done at some point. > > Enhancement Request: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5282 Yes, but other comments seems to show memcmp only doubles speed. This would only bring us twice as slow as python ;-) Denis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com
