Surely I'm not the only person that finds something *incredibly* wrong
with this!?
Sorry but I see nothing but the misconception of const-correctness with
the given example.
I hope you are aware of what you are asking.
For your particular example:
First you started by class, you should use struct. (sorry being lame here
but happens...)
Second why do mark something const if it is not, this is a wrong approach
even in C++ which provides explicit "mutable".
How are you going to do caching anyways, if static array is not the case?
struct matrix {
f32[4][4] m;
f32 det_cache; // ?
f32 mag_cache; // ?
f32 whatever_cache; // ?
};
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
