On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:53:51 -0500, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On Monday, November 29, 2010 12:48:45 Kagamin wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> lack of tail-const/immutable for classes.
>
> And no, Rebindable doesn't cut it.
As I understand, it's primarily issue for collections?
The lack of tail-const is a particularly big problem for handling
ranges, I
believe. It means that certain things will work with arrays which won't
work
with user-defined ranges.
Yes, this applies to non-classes as well, thanks for pointing that out.
But no tail-const for classes is a glaring mistake to anyone learning the
language. Tail-const for ranges is a bit more obscure.
-Steve
