Re: Logical const

[Jesse Phillips]

Jesse Phillips Wrote:

> So what you are saying is that Mutable should not work on value types right? 
> So if we make these assertions:
> 
>       static assert(!__traits(compiles, new class { Mutable!int n; }));
>       immutable A a = new immutable(A);
>       int i = 8;
>       static assert(!__traits(compiles, a.n = &i));
>       static assert(__traits(compiles, *a.n = i));
>       static assert(__traits(compiles, bar(a.n)));
> 
> The last one being what I believe to be an alias this bug, the rest assert 
> correctly:
> 
> https://gist.github.com/721066

Oops didn't give the full context of my assertions (though it is available in 
the gist:

void bar( int n ) {}

class A {
     Mutable!(int*) n;
}