Simen kjaeraas: > In my opinion, the syntax for is() is not all that bad.
Every time I have to use is() for something a bit more complex than just type equivalence, I have to go read the D docs, despite I have used it many times. But now I have memorized most other parts of D syntax. > - It lacks is ( Type : TypeSpecialization , TemplateParameterList ) and > is ( Type == TypeSpecialization , TemplateParameterList ) I think is() needs less stuff, not more. The functionality needs to be moved to a nicer syntax (and according to Andrei a better semantics too). Bye, bearophile
