Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:42:51 -0500, Simen kjaeraas <simen.kja...@gmail.com> wrote:Manfred_Nowak <svv1...@hotmail.com> wrote:But because of `opIndex' this assumption has been invalidated a long time ago.No it hasn't. opIndex should still be O(1), it just can't be enforced.er.. make that O(lg(n)) :) Essentially sub-linear.
Ah, yes. Sorry. -- Simen
