Why don't you retard, I mean eternium, I mean iLikeCakes, I mean snk_kid, I mean WeAreAllTreeBear, I mean bearophile's alter ego, go someplace else. Waisting time here is really not worth it. They provide psychiatric treatment in hospitals. I can't prove this conspiracy easily, but I also voted down your stupid remarks there. I hope this teaches you a lesson.
retard Wrote: > Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:56:45 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > > > Why do /you/ take it personally? > > You've misunderstood. I only wish the discussion was a bit more technical > and had less to do with opinions and hype. The reason is, a more > technical approach might solve technical problems in more efficient way. > But my goal is not to belittle social issues wrt language adoption. > Surely I understand reddit isn't lambda-the-ultimate.org and I'm glad > that the Go trolls didn't find the thread (yet). I just find this > behavior incomprehensible. > > My personal stance on this matter is that I believe a more consistent and > flexible mechanism for operators would fit D. I'm also a bit more of a > fan of C++0x concepts than those contraints shown in the slides. I > haven't really thought how it all would work out, but if the atmosphere > was more ambitious to this direction, I could participate more. But it > seems my vision conflicts badly with what D2 has become. > > > > > On 12/14/10, retard <r...@tard.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:44:36 -0500, snk_kid wrote: > >> > >>> Gary Whatmore Wrote: > >>> > >>>> Simen kjaeraas Wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >>>> > >> Compared to the talk at Google, I changed one of the "cool > >>>> > >> things" from threading to operator overloading. Didn't manage to > >>>> > >> talk about that - there were a million questions - although I > >>>> > >> think it's a great topic. > >>>> > >> http://erdani.com/tdpl/2010-12-08-ACCU.pdf > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Anyone care to do the honors and post this to reddit programming? > >>>> > > >>>> > Done. > >>>> > > >>>> > http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/ > >>>> > >>>> Guys, I made several sockpuppet reddit accounts to mod down the two > >>>> guys >criticising this thread. I recommend everyone to help us > >>>> improve D's publicity by >ignoring these trolls and voting them down. > >>>> It has worked before, too -- reddit >seems to fold the subthreads > >>>> that get too many negative votes. This makes it >look much better > >>>> than it is. > >>>> > >>>> - G.W. > >>> > >>> That's absolutely pathetic, you're actually doing the community a > >>> disservice. > >> > >> I really don't know what to say. Take a look at > >> > >> 0 points: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/c18swbi > >> > >> or > >> > >> -1 points: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/c18sz8n > >> > >> These say nothing against D. Why does one take them personally? They > >> are both also highly informative. As far as I can tell, these two > >> comments go much deeper in operator semantics theory than the combined > >> effort of 68 other threads by Walter, Andrei et al. For example the > >> precedence of operators can get problematic when using several > >> libraries from various vendors. > >> > >> Then you have: > >> > >> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/eklq0/ > >> andrei_alexandrescus_talk_at_accu_silicon_valley/c18t1d5 > >> > >> "I really like D (2.0) and I wish it would take off." > >> > >> 7 points? WTF? What is the value of this reply? It's a purely > >> subjective opinion and doesn't necessarily even beg for further > >> discussion. > >> >