On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:22:25 +0000, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:55:18 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:53:15 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer >> <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> -Steve >>> >>> P. >> >> Damn, accidentally hit shift-enter which sent the message. >> >> Meant to write: >> >> P.S. is there a better adjective for 'immutable or implicitly >> convertable to immutable'? That's a lot of verbiage for something >> that's really needed in a lot of places in the spec. > > Value type? > > That is, a real value type, not one that is really a reference in > disguise. "Pure value type", perhaps?
Ah, forget it. That doesn't include immutable references. -Lars