On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote: > > > Actually if it would be possible to skip the parentheses when the lambda > take more than one argument I would be more happy with that: > > foo(x, y => x * y); > > Pretty sure you'll need parenthesis. Should the above match: func(int function(int, int)) or func(int, int function(int))
- Re: Why Ruby? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Why Ruby? Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Why Ruby? loser
- Re: Why Ruby? Walter Bright
- Re: Why Ruby? Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Why Ruby? JRM
- Re: Why Ruby? Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Why Ruby? bearophile
- Re: Why Ruby? Simen kjaeraas
- Re: Why Ruby? Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Why Ruby? Andrew Wiley
- Re: Why Ruby? retard
- Re: Why Ruby? Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Why Ruby? Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Why Ruby? Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Why Ruby? Walter Bright
- Re: Why Ruby? Simen kjaeraas
- Re: Why Ruby? Walter Bright
- Re: Why Ruby? bearophile
- Re: Why Ruby? Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Why Ruby? Nick Sabalausky