Wednesday 22 December 2010 @ 23:02:44 BLS: > tried SWIG for C++ to D. But frankly said I am not able to offer > substantial feedback 'cause every binding I have created was more or > less in a toy area..
Thanks for answers everyone, swig looks interesting. Again, it strips const so probably D1 (i just skipped D1, it wasn't interesting enough for me to switch from widely used languages so don't know it's feature-set) and it's using tango, but looks promising. It supports shared loading, so I won't need to wait until patch will be finally commited to derelict. So, even if I won't use it right now, and will be needing to develop `const` supporting script I would advice anyone else to check SWIG for D, because it's worth it. Cheers, Mariusz Gliwiński
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
