Andrej Mitrovic: > int i; // auto-initialized to int.init > int i = void; // not initialized
I think the OP meant: 1) int i = void; // not initialized 2) int i = 0; // initialized to 0 3) int i; // meant to be auto-initialized to int.init, similar to case 2 4) int i; // auto-initialized to int.init, but logically not initialized yet in the algorithm So he was thinking about ways to tell apart case 3 from case 4 (C# doesn't have this problem). Bye, bearophile
