Jonathan M Davis Wrote: > But personally, I'd be a bit worried to see more than simple assertions > inside of > contracts.
I agree. And I hope to see Phobos contracts as soon as possible free of enforce() and similar exceptions. It's not just a matter of performance. Otherwise enforce() risks becoming a permanent workaround for a missing but necessary feature. A way to solve the problem DMD has to use a Phobos library compiled in not-release mode when you don't use the -release switch. Bye, bearophile
