On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:41:37 +0200, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
How much of D can you really use without Phobos? I imagine there'd be
no problem in using it as a better C, but there isn't much appeal to
that,
I don't agree there's not much appeal to that. D has quite a bit that
makes C-style code much easier and more robust, such as the module
system. C doesn't even have thread local storage!
You took my line out of context :) Of course D is better than C and can be
used as a better C, but I was making the comparison to C++/STL/Boost.
Well, it depends on which features you're after - if you're Linus Torvalds
and hate abstractions, D minus Phobos would indeed be a better deal than
C++/STL/Boost :)
--
Best regards,
Vladimir mailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
