Am 07.01.2011 03:20, schrieb Caligo:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Russel Winder <rus...@russel.org.uk
<mailto:rus...@russel.org.uk>> wrote:
Whilst I concur (massively) that Subversion is no longer the correct
tool for collaborative working, especially on FOSS projects, but also
for proprietary ones, I am not sure Git is the best choice of tool.
Whilst Git appears to have the zeitgeist, Mercurial and Bazaar are
actually much easier to work with. Where Git has GitHub, Mercurial has
BitBucket, and Bazaar has Launchpad.
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip:
sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net <mailto:sip%3arussel.win...@ekiga.net>
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk
<mailto:rus...@russel.org.uk>
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk <http://www.russel.org.uk>
skype: russel_winder
BitBucket has copied almost everything from Github, and I don't understand how
they've never been sued.
http://dev.pocoo.org/~blackbird/github-vs-bitbucket/bitbucket.html
Yeah, see also: http://schacon.github.com/bitbucket.html by the same author
When this rant was new I read a page that listed where Github stole their ideas
and designs (Sourceforce for example), but I can't find it anymore.
This rant was bullshit, as even the author seems to have accepted.
I don't understand why people still mirror and link this crap.
