On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:46:47 -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > Russel Winder wrote: >> Pity, because using one of Mercurial, Bazaar or Git instead of >> Subversion is likely the best and fastest way of getting more quality >> contributions to review. Although only anecdotal in every case where a >> team has switched to DVCS from CVCS -- except in the case of closed >> projects, obviously -- it has opened things up to far more people to >> provide contributions. Subversion is probably now the single biggest >> barrier to getting input on system evolution. > > > A couple months back, I did propose moving to git on the dmd internals > mailing list, and nobody was interested.
I proposed the same on the Phobos list in May, but the discussion went nowhere. It seemed the general consensus was that SVN was "good enough". -Lars
