On 1/12/11 2:30 PM, retard wrote:
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:46:46 +0100, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:

Wow. The thread that went "Moving to D"->"Problems with
DMD"->"DVCS"->"WHICH DVCS"->"Linux Problems"->"Driver
Problems/Manufacturer preferences"->"Cheap VS. Expensive". It's a
personally observed record of OT threads, I think.

Anyways, I've refrained from throwing fuel on the thread as long as I
can, I'll bite:

It depends on a number of factors, including the quality of the card
and the conditions that it's being used in. I've had video cards die
before. I _think_ that it was due to overheating, but I really don't
know. It doesn't really matter. The older the part, the more likely it
is to break. The cheaper the part, the more likely it is to break.
Sure, the lack of moving parts makes it less likely for a video card to
die, but it definitely happens. Computer parts don't last forever, and
the lower their quality, the less likely it is that they'll last. By no
means does that mean that a cheap video card isn't necessarily going to
last for years and function just fine, but it is a risk that a cheap
card will be too cheap to last.
"Cheap" in the sense of "less money" isn't the problem. Actually, HW
that cost more is often high-end HW which creates more heat, which
_might_ actually shorten the lifetime. On the other hand, low-end HW is
often less heat-producing, which _might_ make it last longer. The real
difference lies in what level of HW are sold at which clock-levels, I.E.
manufacturing control procedures. So an expensive low-end for a hundred
bucks might easily outlast a cheap high-end alternative for 4 times the
money.

Buy quality, not expensive. There is a difference.

Nicely written, I fully agree with you.

Same here. It's not well understood that heating/cooling cycles with the corresponding expansion and contraction cycles are the main reason for which electronics fail. At an extreme, the green-minded person who turns all CFLs and all computers off at all opportunities ends up producing more expense and more waste than the lazier person who leaves stuff on for longer periods of time.


Andrei

Reply via email to