Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > On 1/21/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: >> Umm. in is never the default. in is essentially an alias for const scope. >> The >> default is non-shared and mutable. >> >> - Jonathan M Davis >> > > That's what I thought. But I did saw it mentioned in this NG a couple > of times, I can't remember by who though. > > In any case, "in" seems to be missing from that enum definition. So > unless there's a specific reason for its absence, I'd file an > enhancement request.
It's not needed because it should resolve to SCOPE for ParameterStorageClass and const is not a storage class, but a type constructor.
