On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:03:19 -0500, so <s...@so.do> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:11:48 +0200, Trass3r <u...@known.com> wrote:
Sadly true.
They intend to replace it with a library based solution, I don't know
why.
If the library solution is as good as the original, it is a big plus.
If only we could do the same for everything!
In fact the library solution will be better, because it's an expression,
not a storage class.
This means, you can "scope" a class inside another statement instead of
having to declare/initialize it separately. It solves a bug I filed:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2070
-Steve
