In case you didn't know, I have a set of unit test helper functions which have 
been being reviewed for possible inclusion in phobos. Here's an update.

Most recent code: http://is.gd/F1OHat

Okay. I took the previous suggestions into consideration and adjusted the code 
a 
bit more. However, most of the changes are to the documentation (though there 
are some changes to the code). Some of the code duplication was removed, and 
the 
way that some of the assertPred functions' errors are formatted has been 
altered 
so that values line up vertically, making them easier to compare. The big 
change 
is the docs though. There's now a fake version of assertPred at the top with an 
overall description for assertPred followed by the individual versions with as 
little documentation as seemed appropriate while still getting all of the 
necessary information across. A couple of the functions still have irritatingly 
long example sections, but anything less wouldn't get the functionality across.

In any case. Here's the updated code. Review away. Andrei set the vote deadline 
for February 7th, at which point, if it passes majority vote, then it will go 
into Phobos. The number of functions is small enough now (thanks to having 
consolidated most of them into the fantastically versatile assertPred) that it 
looks like it will likely go in std.exception if the vote passes rather than 
becoming a new module. So, the std.unittests title has now become a bit of a 
misnomer, but that's what I've been calling it, so it seemed appropriate to 
continue to label it that way in the thread's title.

- Jonathan M Davis

Reply via email to