Jonathan M Davis napisał: > I think that at least a couple of people have said that they have the > beginnings > of a replacement, but I don't believe that anyone has stepped up to say that > they'll actually complete and propose a module for inclusion in Phobos.
Wimps ;-) > So, std.xml is still very much up in the air, and Tango has set a very high > bar > with regards to speed. And while we may not be able to match Tango for speed > - > especially at first - we'd definitely like to have an xml solution that's > close. > And that's not necessarily going to be easy - especially since we're > inevitably > going to want a range-based solution. And while ranges can be quite > efficient, it > can also be easy to make them inefficient if you're not careful. Speaking of Tango, may I look at it? I remember that beef over the first datetime and it gives me shivers... -- Tomek
