Re: A better assert() [was: Re: std.unittests [updated] for review]

[spir]

On 02/04/2011 01:40 PM, bearophile wrote:
So moving them into explicit little features makes the language more

The two little features I am talking about are:
- a halt() somewhere like in core.bitop or std.intrinsic or the default object 
module to replace assert(0);

What about exit()? What would be the practical or semantic diff of halt() 
compared to exit()?

Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com