On Monday, February 07, 2011 17:11:50 bearophile wrote: > Nick Sabalausky: > > (Although, I didn't read the OP very closely, so maybe I'm off-base.) > > They are right, I have done a "strategic" error. In the original post I > have mixed two kinds of very unrelated things: very small suggestions to > improve (in my opinion) Phobos, plus some critiques to the D2 language > compared to Python. People have rightly not appreciated my post because of > the second group of useless comments. I am sorry, I am just stupid. > Regarding the original post, in Bugzilla I have added only Phobos-related > things.
Stupid is going a bit far. You do seem to have a tendancy however to at least present things as if D should act like python, which isn't necessarily a good thing. Different points of view on how to go about solving problems can lead to better solutions however. It's just that it doesn't necssarily make sense for D to act like python, and you often come across like D is defficient when it does things differently than python. - Jonathan M Davis
