On 02/12/2011 12:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/12/11 5:02 AM, bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
interval is slightly better, but as you mention, the step value muddles that
abstraction.
It's not muddled enough to make it worse than iota(). "iota" has nearly no
relation with its purpose in Phobos.
And that's part of what makes it best.
What about a random name generator to define a language.stdlib's lexicon? Then
run a post-filter fed by user complaints about given names actually suggesting
some relation to any [part|aspect] of their sense.
denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
