spir: > what about using '*' for chaining syntax sugar. I mean, func composition is > often written using '.' which means product (and is sometimes even spelled > "product" for functions too), right? And product is written '*' in D... What > do > you think?
I think that using * for lazy chaining breaks the genericity of the code, because you need a symbol for arrays/strings and another symbol for lazy sequences. So it's mostly useless if not actively negative. Bye, bearophile
