"Alan Smithee" <em...@example.com> wrote in message news:ij967s$12rb$1...@digitalmars.com... > Andrej Mitrovic Wrote: > >> Could you elaborate on that? Aren't .di files supposed to be auto- > generated by the compiler, and not hand-written? > > Yea, aren't they? How come no one uses that feature? Perhaps it's > intrinsically broken? *hint hint* >
"Perhaps"? Well, is it or isn't it? Are we supposed to just assume that lack of use means it's actually broken and not just unpopular? > > This NG assumes a curious stance. Sprouting claims and standing by > them until they're shown invalid, and then some. Just like you're doing? If you're sure that .di files are broken, then *show us* how. > > "But it takes time!" ... uh, yea, how's for 11 years? Or at least 4 > which D has been past the 1.0 version. How many people gave up on > their med/large projects and moved to "lesser" languages in this > span? Then contribute instead of just flaming.