On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:01:53 +0300, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
useful improvement.
I agree with that, but there's a caveat. I did such a thing years ago
for C++ and Optlink. Nobody cared, including the people who asked for
that feature. It's a bit demotivating to bother doing that again.
Many people are unthankful by nature. They tell about missing features
while taking existing ones as granted.
It doesn't mean no one cares about them. If no one would care, why would
we even discuss those features?
