retard wrote:
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:01:53 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
retard wrote:
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:44:43 +0200, so wrote:
Unfortunately DMC is always out of the question because the
performance is 10-20 (years) behind competition, fast compilation
won't help it.
Can you please give a few links on this?
What kind of proof you need then? Just take some existing piece of code
with high performance requirements and compile it with dmc. You lose.
http://biolpc22.york.ac.uk/wx/wxhatch/wxMSW_Compiler_choice.html
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.perfometer/37
That link shows dmc winning.
No, it doesn't. In the Fib-50000 test where the optimizations bring
largest improvements in wall clock time, g++ 3.3.1, vc++7, bc++ 5.5.1,
and icc are all faster with optimized settings.
And dmc is faster with Fib-25000.
This test is a joke anyway.
You picked these benchmarks, not me.
