"Walter Bright" <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:ijeil4$2aso$3...@digitalmars.com... > spir wrote: >> Having to constantly explain that "_t" means type, that "size" does not >> mean size, what this type is supposed to mean instead, what it is used >> for in core and stdlib functionality, and what programmers are supposed >> to use it for... isn't this a waste of our time? This, only because the >> name is mindless? > > No, because there is a vast body of work that uses size_t and a vast body > of programmers who know what it is and are totally used to it. >
And there's a vast body who don't. And there's a vast body who are used to C++, so let's just abandon D and make it an implementation of C++ instead.
