On 2011-02-22 13:15:03 -0500, %u <wfunct...@hotmail.com> said:
So okay, fine... 2 out of about 8. That still doesn't mean the rest of them should be allowed, though... think about how confusing code with a "pure" destructor would be.
What's the problem with a pure destructor? It only means you can't access global variables. If the object holds a pointer to somewhere, you can still affect that somewhere.
In fact, if your struct's destructor isn't pure, how can you use it as a local variable inside of a pure function?
-- Michel Fortin michel.for...@michelf.com http://michelf.com/
