Walter Bright дµ½: > Bruno Medeiros wrote: > > * making static arrays value types. The kind of hybrid/weird reference > > type it was before was but a relic from C days, it did not add value to > > the language, on the contrary... > > Thinking about it, I and others thought that static arrays logically should > behave like structs, i.e. be value types. C's view of them is just > fundamentally > messed up.
template+range£¬can or cannot make the syntax simpler then? thanks ! will you please