On Mar 1, 11 05:04, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Adam Ruppe <destructiona...@gmail.com> wrote:
Another alternative is to give each element their own struct...
struct Width { int width; alias width this; }
foo(Width(10), Height(20));
Clearly this can be done better:
struct _(string s) { int data; alias data this; }
foo(_!"width"(10), _!"height"(20));
How are these better than
foo(/*width*/ 10, /*height*/ 20);
? One advantage of named parameter is the compiler can verify you've
passed in the correct order, and all these alternatives cannot.
