On Wednesday 02 March 2011 21:09:09 Bekenn wrote: > On 3/2/2011 8:41 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > Uniform Function Call Syntax. It means that _any_ type could have > > functions called on it as if they were member functions of that type. > > e.g. > > OK, thanks. > > This sounds like the sort of thing that should require an annotation in > the declaration...
Well, it wouldn't be universal then. For a function to be treated as a property, it would require an annotation, but universal function call syntax isn't supposed to require an annotation any more than calling a function on an array as if it were a member function requires an annotation. It's supposed to work with any function. - Jonathan M davis
