spir Wrote: > On 03/06/2011 04:27 PM, foobar wrote: > >>> Are there other concerns? > >> > > >> > I think that every individual variable, function and type in Phobos > >> > should > >> > use the naming convention of whatever random language the author > >> > happened to > >> > be thinking of when they wrote it. That way Phobos won't seem messy. > >> > Plus, > >> > the lack of any sensible rules would make it super-easy to remember all > >> > the > >> > different spellings, punctuations and capitalizations. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > I would also add to the above excellent point that in order to prevent > > unworthy people of programming in the holly D programming language we must > > require every D programmer to be fluent in English, Latin and Greek > > (including cultural references to movies and such), have *at least* expert > > Unix hacking credentials, have a certified MSFT engineering diploma, be > > Guru level programmers in all of the following: c, c++, Haskell, Perl, APL, > > LISP, ALGOL and COBOL. > > AND, lest we forget, they must code ONLY in a terminal based text-editor > > with 80 character wide lines. > > Thus, if I understand correctly, the D community finally let down all > prerequisites in fields of mathematical logics, philosophy of language, and > metaphysics of automata? Or what? > > Denis > -- > _________________ > vita es estrany > spir.wikidot.com >
Oh my, I forgot those! Don't be silly, The D prerequisites can only grow. It is cosmologically impossible to remove anything since it is written in punch-cards (which is worse than writing in stones).
