Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/17/11 11:21 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/17/11, Nick Sabalausky<a@a.a> wrote:
I've long been convinced that "alias old new;" should really be
"alias new =
old;" The current way confuses me, and I *still* have to consciously
stop
and think about it every time I write an alias statement (including just
now).
I thought I was the only one. The `alias symbol this` in structs in
particular always stops me and I have to think about what it means,
even though it might be obvious.
I'm with y'all too. Even Walter needs to stop and think for a second.
We're considering enabling
alias a = b;
as an equivalent for
alias b a;
Andrei
That would be great!
